In the past weeks, residents in different areas of Dearborn have separately reached out to city leaders, suggesting that neighbors are violating the terms and spirit of Dearborn’s vague attempt to protect our trees.
Here are the conditions that must be met for tree removal within Dearborn:
a. Where necessary for the location of a structure or site improvement and when a reasonable and prudent alternative location for such structure or improvement can be demonstrated to create an undue hardship.
b. Where removal or relocation of the tree is consistent with good forestry practices or if it will enhance the health of remaining trees.
Yet trees continue to come down throughout our city for no apparent reason. Residents on Elmwood recently watched in shock as a tree removal company ripped down a stand of oaks that stood in the neighborhood for over 100 years. Similar reports have come in from the Outer Drive and Cherry Hill area, and we’ve witnessed the same happening near Howard Elementary School and Crowley Park. It’s shameful and it’s time it came to an end.
We believe the ordinance in its current form does little to protect one of Dearborn’s most important resources. The city’s quickly vanishing canopy of oaks and maples add not only to the value of all our homes, they beautify our city and improve the overall quality of life in our community. For everyone.
It’s time for the administration and our city council to redefine its policy on tree removal. The city needs a clear process regarding how and why mature trees are removed from residential as well as business properties. A policy that demands the replacement of displaced trees. A policy with real teeth that punishes companies that participate in the destruction of Dearborn’s trees.
Only then can our city proudly reclaim our title as ‘Tree City.’













